[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ddd58293-0b5b-3c34-c396-0a635444410d@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 13:54:12 +0800
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3] pinctrl: ocelot: add missing destroy_workqueue()
in error path in ocelot_pinctrl_probe()
Hi,
On 2022/10/5 3:57, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 1:46 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 4:06 AM Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Using devm_add_action_or_reset() to make workqueue device-managed, so it can be
>>> destroy whenever the driver is unbound.
>>>
>>> Fixes: c297561bc98a ("pinctrl: ocelot: Fix interrupt controller")
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>> v3:
>>> Using devm_add_action_or_reset().
>> Patch applied, after deleting the hunks removing .remove because
>> that was already gone upstream.
> Ah, the patch introducing that is in the MFD tree is it not?
>
> Either ask Lee to apply it or wait until -rc1 it's no big deal
> anyway. Remind me in two weeks.
It's OK.
Thanks,
Yang
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists