linux-kernel - Re: [RFC V2 PATCH 02/11] cxl/mem: Implement Get Event Records command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 15 Oct 2022 07:28:40 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     ira.weiny@...el.com
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 PATCH 02/11] cxl/mem: Implement Get Event Records
 command

On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 15:41:22 -0700
ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:

> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..318ba5fe046e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/trace/events/cxl.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM cxl
> +
> +#if !defined(_CXL_TRACE_EVENTS_H) ||  defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +#define _CXL_TRACE_EVENTS_H
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/unaligned.h>
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(overflow,

Please do not use generic names for grouped events. As most tooling can
use the name and not associate it with the group, it makes it ambiguous
for what event it wants to enable.

That is, call it "cxl_overflow" and not "overflow".

> +
> +	TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, enum cxl_event_log_type log,
> +		 struct cxl_get_event_payload *payload),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(dev_name, log, payload),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__string(dev_name, dev_name)
> +		__field(int, log)
> +		__field(u64, first)
> +		__field(u64, last)
> +		__field(u16, count)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__assign_str(dev_name, dev_name);
> +		__entry->log = log;
> +		__entry->count = le16_to_cpu(payload->overflow_err_count);
> +		__entry->first = le64_to_cpu(payload->first_overflow_timestamp);
> +		__entry->last = le64_to_cpu(payload->last_overflow_timestamp);
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("%s: EVENT LOG OVERFLOW log=%s : %u records from %llu to %llu",
> +		__get_str(dev_name), cxl_event_log_type_str(__entry->log),
> +		__entry->count, __entry->first, __entry->last)
> +
> +);
> +

> +TRACE_EVENT(generic_event,

Same here. It's a "cxl_generic_event" not a "generic_event" that will
clash with any other subsystem that would (but shouldn't) use the same
name.

-- Steve

> +
> +	TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, enum cxl_event_log_type log,
> +		 struct cxl_event_record_raw *rec),
> +
> +	TP_ARGS(dev_name, log, rec),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		CXL_EVT_TP_entry
> +		__array(u8, data, CXL_EVENT_RECORD_DATA_LENGTH)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		CXL_EVT_TP_fast_assign(dev_name, log, rec->hdr);
> +		memcpy(__entry->data, &rec->data, CXL_EVENT_RECORD_DATA_LENGTH);
> +	),
> +
> +	CXL_EVT_TP_printk("%s",
> +		__print_hex(__entry->data, CXL_EVENT_RECORD_DATA_LENGTH))
> +);
> +
> +#endif /* _CXL_TRACE_EVENTS_H */
>