linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] ACPI: PPTT: Remove acpi_find_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:56:45 +0100
From:   Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ACPI: PPTT: Remove acpi_find_cache_levels()



On 11/8/22 17:13, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 12:04:19PM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote:
>> acpi_find_cache_levels() is used at a single place and is short
>> enough to be merged into the calling function. The removal allows
>> an easier renaming of the calling function in the next patch.
>>
>> Also reorder the parameters in the 'reversed Christmas tree' order.
> 
> Not sure if the above is worth mentioning explicitly. Even if you do,
> 'parameters' sounds very confusing to at-least me. I was searching for
> the changes is some function parameters to understand what it was and
> finally realised you meant the stack variable declaration order here.
> Right ?

Yes right, I will use another word.

> 
> 
> Other than that, it looks good.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> 

Regards,
Pierre