linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] arch_topology: Build cacheinfo from primary CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202211090127.c1LB7Sle-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 01:17:15 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
        Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>,
        SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arch_topology: Build cacheinfo from primary CPU

Hi Pierre,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on driver-core/driver-core-testing]
[also build test WARNING on driver-core/driver-core-next driver-core/driver-core-linus arm64/for-next/core rafael-pm/linux-next linus/master v6.1-rc4 next-20221108]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pierre-Gondois/arch_topology-Build-cacheinfo-from-primary-CPU/20221108-190738
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221108110424.166896-6-pierre.gondois%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH 5/5] arch_topology: Build cacheinfo from primary CPU
config: ia64-randconfig-r024-20221108
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/1d2759f5c9fe043ae00116c153312eb6de3f4748
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Pierre-Gondois/arch_topology-Build-cacheinfo-from-primary-CPU/20221108-190738
        git checkout 1d2759f5c9fe043ae00116c153312eb6de3f4748
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=ia64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/base/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/base/cacheinfo.c: In function 'allocate_cache_info':
>> drivers/base/cacheinfo.c:404:50: warning: 'levels' is used uninitialized [-Wuninitialized]
     404 |                 this_cpu_ci->num_leaves = levels + split_levels;
         |                                           ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/base/cacheinfo.c:389:22: note: 'levels' was declared here
     389 |         unsigned int levels, split_levels;
         |                      ^~~~~~
>> drivers/base/cacheinfo.c:404:50: warning: 'split_levels' is used uninitialized [-Wuninitialized]
     404 |                 this_cpu_ci->num_leaves = levels + split_levels;
         |                                           ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/base/cacheinfo.c:389:30: note: 'split_levels' was declared here
     389 |         unsigned int levels, split_levels;
         |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/levels +404 drivers/base/cacheinfo.c

   385	
   386	int allocate_cache_info(unsigned int cpu)
   387	{
   388		struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci;
   389		unsigned int levels, split_levels;
   390		int ret;
   391	
   392		if (acpi_disabled)
   393			ret = init_of_cache_level(cpu);
   394		else {
   395			ret = acpi_get_cache_info(cpu, &levels, &split_levels);
   396			this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
   397			this_cpu_ci->num_levels = levels;
   398			/*
   399			 * This assumes that:
   400			 * - there cannot be any split caches (data/instruction)
   401			 *   above a unified cache
   402			 * - data/instruction caches come by pair
   403			 */
 > 404			this_cpu_ci->num_leaves = levels + split_levels;
   405		}
   406		if (ret < 0)
   407			return ret;
   408		else if (!cache_leaves(cpu))
   409			return -ENOENT;
   410	
   411		per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) = kcalloc(cache_leaves(cpu),
   412						sizeof(struct cacheinfo), GFP_ATOMIC);
   413		if (per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) == NULL) {
   414			cache_leaves(cpu) = 0;
   415			return -ENOMEM;
   416		}
   417	
   418		return ret;
   419	}
   420	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (158171 bytes)