[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaPDXBWKQgNnmBLBmaXDo6roEDSpe1wrvMi_aG5F52K4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:53:50 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Get rid of devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 5:48 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 2:18 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 02:48:26PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Hi Pavel, Marek,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > This drops the last uses of devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
> > > > from the tree and drops the stubs implementing this API on top of
> > > > devm_fwnode_gpiod_get_index().
> > > >
> > > > Note that the bulk of users were converted in 2019, the couple of LED
> > > > drivers are all that have remained.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Dmitry Torokhov (3):
> > > > leds: gpio: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
> > > > leds: lgm-sso: switch to using devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
> > > > gpiolib: remove devm_fwnode_get_[index_]gpiod_from_child()
> > > >
> > > > drivers/leds/blink/leds-lgm-sso.c | 5 ++---
> > > > drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 5 ++---
> > > > include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 21 ---------------------
> > > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > > > ---
> > > > base-commit: 7fd22855300e693668c3397771b3a2b3948f827a
> > > > change-id: 20220902-get_gpiod_from_child-remove-a62638849e91
> > > >
> > >
> > > Could you please consider picking this up for 6.1? Or would you be OK
> > > with this going through other tree (GPIO maybe)?
> >
> > *ping* Could this go through GPIO tree? Dropping this API helps with
> > some outstanding work that I have...
> >
>
> Sure! I'll let it wait for another week - it would be great to get an
> ack from Pavel - but in case of no response I'll take it through my
> tree.
I'd say just apply it at this point.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists