linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] brcmfmac: Add support for BCM43596 PCIe Wi-Fi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2022 17:47:12 +0100
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        "~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht" 
        <~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
        "martin.botka@...ainline.org" <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        "angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org" 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        "marijn.suijten@...ainline.org" <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        "jamipkettunen@...ainline.org" <jamipkettunen@...ainline.org>,
        Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
        Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
        Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        "Zhao, Jiaqing" <jiaqing.zhao@...el.com>,
        "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Soon Tak Lee <soontak.lee@...ress.com>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com" 
        <brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
        "SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com" <SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] brcmfmac: Add support for BCM43596 PCIe Wi-Fi



On 26/09/2022 11:27, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk> writes:
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 03:02:12PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:21 PM Konrad Dybcio
>>> <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Also worth noting is the 'somc' bit, meaning there are probably *some* SONY
>>>> customizations, but that's also just a guess.
>>>
>>> What I have seen from BRCM customizations on Samsung phones is that
>>> the per-device customization of firmware seems to involve the set-up of
>>> some GPIO and power management pins. For example if integrated with
>>> an SoC that has autonomous system resume, or if some GPIO line has
>>> to be pulled to enable an external regulator or PA.
>>
>> At least with Infineon (formerly Cypress), as a customer you might get a
>> private firmware and this will be maintained internally by them on a
>> separate customer branch. Any subsequent bugfixes or feature requests
>> will usually be applied to that customer branch and a new firmware built
>> from it. I think their internal "mainline" branch might get merged into
>> the customer branches from time to time, but this seems to be done on an
>> ad-hoc basis. This is our experience at least.
>>
>> I would also point out that the BCM4359 is equivalent to the
>> CYW88359/CYW89359 chipset, which we are using in some of our
>> products. Note that this is a Cypress chipset (identifiable by the
>> Version: ... (... CY) tag in the version string). But the FW Konrad is
>> linking appears to be for a Broadcom chipset.
>>
>> FYI, here's a publicly available set of firmware files for the '4359:
>>
>> https://github.com/NXP/imx-firmware/tree/master/cyw-wifi-bt/1FD_CYW4359
>>
>> Anyway, I would second Hector's suggestion and make this a separate FW.
> 
> I also recommend having a separate firmware filename. Like Hector said,
> it's easy to have a symlink in userspace if same binary can be used.
So, I dusted off this patch and tried to change the fw name, only to 
discover that the BRCM_PCIE_43596_DEVICE_ID is equal to 
CY_PCIE_89459_DEVICE_ID, (which btw uses 4355/89459 fw), but then it 
makes the driver expect 4359/9 based on rev matching, so... the 43596 
chip ID may be a lie? Or at least for the one used in my particular 
device? I'm beyond confused now..

I can think of a couple of hacky ways to force use of 43596 fw, but I 
don't think any would be really upstreamable..

Any thoughts?

Konrad