[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB527665EA1BE0427B33E2CC1F8C0F9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 03:11:49 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [patch V2 29/33] PCI/MSI: Provide pci_ims_alloc/free_irq()
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 10:38 PM
>
> + * There is no index for IMS allocations as IMS is an implementation
> + * specific storage and does not have any direct associations between
> + * index, which might be a pure software construct, and device
> + * functionality. This association is established by the driver either via
> + * the index - if there is a hardware table - or in case of purely software
> + * managed IMS implementation the association happens via the
> + * irq_write_msi_msg() callback of the implementation specific interrupt
> + * chip, which utilizes the provided @cookie to store the MSI message in
@icookie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists