[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4d78eb0-4492-ac7f-d500-3d49b0dc7aa1@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:43:53 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>, jgg@...pe.ca, leon@...nel.org,
dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com
Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, bart.vanassche@....com,
easwar.hariharan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] RDMA/srp: Fix error return code in
srp_parse_options()
On 11/28/22 18:04, Wang Yufen wrote:
> In the previous while loop, "ret" may be assigned zero, , so the error
The word "iteration" is missing from the above sentence. Additionally,
there is a double comma.
> return code may be incorrectly set to 0 instead of -EINVAL. Alse
Alse -> Also
> case SRP_OPT_QUEUE_SIZE:
> - if (match_int(args, &token) || token < 1) {
> + ret = match_int(args, &token);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + if (token < 1) {
> pr_warn("bad queue_size parameter '%s'\n", p);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
> target->scsi_host->can_queue = token;
Why only to report "bad queue_size parameter" if ret == 0 && token < 1
but not if ret < 0? This is a behavior change that has not been
explained in the patch description.
> @@ -3490,25 +3496,34 @@ static int srp_parse_options(struct net *net, const char *buf,
> break;
>
> case SRP_OPT_MAX_CMD_PER_LUN:
> - if (match_int(args, &token) || token < 1) {
> + ret = match_int(args, &token);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + if (token < 1) {
> pr_warn("bad max cmd_per_lun parameter '%s'\n",
> p);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
> target->scsi_host->cmd_per_lun = token;
> break;
Same comment here and for many other changes below.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists