[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB7PR04MB4010B71F54175CD7C73C3FC490C69@DB7PR04MB4010.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:01:25 +0000
From: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: "brgl@...ev.pl" <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"stefan@...er.ch" <stefan@...er.ch>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: vf610: Support building gpio-vf610 driver as
module
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Sent: 2022年12月29日 9:46
> To: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>
> Cc: brgl@...ev.pl; stefan@...er.ch; linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@....com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: vf610: Support building gpio-vf610 driver as
> module
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:02 AM <haibo.chen@....com> wrote:
>
> > From: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>
> >
> > To support Android GKI, need to build this driver as module.
> > So change the config as tristate type, and add module license.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jindong Yue <jindong.yue@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>
>
> OK...
>
> > builtin_platform_driver(vf610_gpio_driver);
>
> Then you want something like module_platform_driver() here.
Hi Linus,
Here, though need to build this gpio driver as module due to the Android GKI, but we do not really need to
rmmod/unbind this driver, so do not need to implement the _exit or remove callback.
In this case, still need to change to module_platform_driver()?
If so, after use the module_platform_driver(), is it okay to not implement the __exit /remove callback?
Best Regards
Haibo Chen
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists