[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR12MB261965B861DD6BC8DB76631CE4B29@DM6PR12MB2619.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 09:22:52 +0000
From: "Quan, Evan" <Evan.Quan@....com>
To: Jeff Pang <jeff.pang.chn@...il.com>
CC: "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] gpu: amd/pm: mark symbols static where possible for smu11
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Thanks. But I think there was already a patch from Kun Liu to address this issue.
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/2023-March/090029.html
BR
Evan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Pang <jeff.pang.chn@...il.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 5:16 PM
> To: Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan@....com>
> Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dri-
> devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; Jeff Pang <jeff.pang.chn@...il.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] gpu: amd/pm: mark symbols static where possible for
> smu11
>
> I get one warning when building kernel with -Werror=missing-prototypes :
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c:1600:5:
> error: no previous prototype for ‘vangogh_set_apu_thermal_limit’
> [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> int vangogh_set_apu_thermal_limit(struct smu_context *smu, uint32_t limit)
>
> In fact, this function don't need a declaration due to it's only used in the file
> which they are.
> So this patch marks the function with 'static'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Pang <jeff.pang.chn@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
> index 016d5621e0b3..24046af60933 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.c
> @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ static int vangogh_get_apu_thermal_limit(struct
> smu_context *smu, uint32_t *limi
> 0, limit);
> }
>
> -int vangogh_set_apu_thermal_limit(struct smu_context *smu, uint32_t
> limit)
> +static int vangogh_set_apu_thermal_limit(struct smu_context *smu,
> +uint32_t limit)
> {
> return smu_cmn_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu,
>
> SMU_MSG_SetReducedThermalLimit,
> --
> 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists