[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <774cb6d15fef0e0b41e7a071eedef980.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 14:41:11 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Taube <Mr.Bossman075@...il.com>,
Yimin Gu <ustcymgu@...il.com>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@...nadk.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: k210: remove an implicit 64-bit division
Quoting Jesse Taube (2023-02-28 16:26:55)
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> The K210 clock driver depends on SOC_CANAAN, which is only selectable
> when !MMU on RISC-V. !MMU is not possible on 32-bit yet, but patches
> have been sent for its enabling. The kernel test robot reported this
> implicit 64-bit division there.
>
> Replace the implicit division with an explicit one.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/202301201538.zNlqgE4L-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <Mr.Bossman075@...il.com>
> ---
Seems better to merge this one-liner earlier to unblock 32-bit.
Applied to clk-fixes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists