lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBq9uO6wLI1fX1x/@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 01:35:04 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     ye.xingchen@....com.cn
Cc:     mcgrof@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linmiaohe@...wei.com,
        chi.minghao@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/2] mm: compaction: move compaction sysctl to its own
 file

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:46:28AM +0800, ye.xingchen@....com.cn wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
> 
> This moves all compaction sysctls to its own file.

So there's a whole lot of these 'move sysctrls to their own file'
patches, but no actual explanation of why that is desirable.  Please
explain why we'd want to split code that is closely related, and now
requires marking symbols non-static just to create a new tiny source
file.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ