[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96d44033-3bfd-840b-15d7-80dd3a1a5313@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 11:29:52 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: profiling: Using generic unwinding in profile_pc
On 4/2/2023 6:24 PM, Chen Zhongjin wrote:
> Just ping... Or has profile code already been obsoleted?
I think it would be reasonable to remove the locked functions hack since
lock profiling can be handled with much better other tools these days.
I wouldn't make it depend on the generic unwinder since such a low level
facility is likely better off without complex dependencies that could break.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists