linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: watchdog: drop duplicated GPIO watchdog bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 16 Apr 2023 19:26:27 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: watchdog: drop duplicated GPIO watchdog
 bindings

On 16/04/2023 18:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 4/15/23 02:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Two conversions to DT schema of GPIO watchdog binding happened and came
>> through different trees.  Merge them into one:
>> 1. Combine maintainers,
>> 2. Use more descriptive property descriptions and constraints from
>>     gpio-wdt.yaml,
>> 3. Switch to unevaluatedProperties:false, to allow generic watchdog
>>     properties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> 
> For the series:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> 
> On a side note, the e-mail addresses in patchwork are messed up for
> patches sent by you. As result, I can not reply to your e-mails after
> pulling a patch from patchwork. This means that some replies get lost
> if I did not keep the original e-mail.
> 
> That is how it looks like after I pull one of your patches from patchwork:
> 
> To:
> +=?unknown-8bit?q?Wim_Van_Sebroeck_=3Cwim=40linux-watchdog=2Eorg=3E=2C_Gu?==?unknown-8bit?q?enter_Roeck_=3Clinux=40roeck-us=2Enet=3E=2C_Rob_Herring_?==?unknown-8bit?q?=3Crobh+dt=40kernel=2Eorg=3E=2C_Krzysztof_Kozlowski_=3Ckrz?==?unknown-8bit?q?yszt

(Trimmed cc list)

Thanks for letting me know, I wonder what's the problem. I am sending
with send-email exactly the same way every day, but somehow this series
have such header in Patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/patch/20230415095112.51257-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Which I do not see in:
1. lore:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230415095112.51257-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

2. Previous patches on Patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/patch/20230310223012.315897-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Lore (1 above) points to possible unescaped UTF character for
rafal@...ecki.pl, but I wonder why send-email did not handle it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof