linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: Add starfive,jh7110-dphy-rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <31c582a7-682a-330e-51d4-53b4a0c5f3a2@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 16 Apr 2023 19:29:32 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@...rfivetech.com>,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: Add starfive,jh7110-dphy-rx

On 13/04/2023 11:02, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/4/13 16:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/04/2023 04:34, Changhuang Liang wrote:
>>>>>>> +  lane_maps:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did this appear? Underscores are not allowed. It looks like you
>>>>>> re-implement some standard property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will change to lane-maps.
>>>>> Yes, according to Vinod advice, lane mapping table use device tree
>>>>> to parse makes sense.
>>>>
>>>> Hm, I have a feeling that I saw such property, so you should dig into
>>>> existing and in-flight bindings.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>
>>> A standard property? Like "clocks" or "resets"?
>>
>> Like lane-polarities now submitted to one MIPI.
>>
>> Anyway it does not look like a property of a board. You said it is fixed
>> per SoC, so it should be implied from the compatible. Otherwise please
>> explain in description and provide some rationale.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> This property is the only one used for this IP, I have compared this IP with
> other DPHY rx module, DPHY modules form the other manufacturers not have this
> configure.
> And we also have a SoC called JH7100. It DPHY rx module is the same as JH7110.
> But we don't do the upstream work on it. If it use this lane-maps will be 
> configure as "lane_maps = /bits/ 8 <0 1 2 3 4 5>;".

And JH7100 is different SoC, so you have different compatible. Again -
is this board specific? If not, looks like SoC specific, thus imply it
from compatible.


Best regards,
Krzysztof