| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 22:00:43 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@...e.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 04/11] efi/x86: Implement support for unaccepted memory
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:30:22AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hello Kirill,
>
> On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 01:46, Kirill A. Shutemov
> <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > UEFI Specification version 2.9 introduces the concept of memory
> > acceptance: Some Virtual Machine platforms, such as Intel TDX or AMD
> > SEV-SNP, requiring memory to be accepted before it can be used by the
> > guest. Accepting happens via a protocol specific for the Virtual
> > Machine platform.
> >
> > Accepting memory is costly and it makes VMM allocate memory for the
> > accepted guest physical address range. It's better to postpone memory
> > acceptance until memory is needed. It lowers boot time and reduces
> > memory overhead.
> >
> > The kernel needs to know what memory has been accepted. Firmware
> > communicates this information via memory map: a new memory type --
> > EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY -- indicates such memory.
> >
> > Range-based tracking works fine for firmware, but it gets bulky for
> > the kernel: e820 has to be modified on every page acceptance. It leads
> > to table fragmentation, but there's a limited number of entries in the
> > e820 table
> >
> > Another option is to mark such memory as usable in e820 and track if the
> > range has been accepted in a bitmap. One bit in the bitmap represents
> > 2MiB in the address space: one 4k page is enough to track 64GiB or
> > physical address space.
> >
> > In the worst-case scenario -- a huge hole in the middle of the
> > address space -- It needs 256MiB to handle 4PiB of the address
> > space.
> >
> > Any unaccepted memory that is not aligned to 2M gets accepted upfront.
> >
> > The bitmap is allocated and constructed in the EFI stub and passed down
> > to the kernel via boot_params. allocate_e820() allocates the bitmap if
> > unaccepted memory is present, according to the maximum address in the
> > memory map.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/arch/x86/zero-page.rst | 1 +
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h | 10 ++++
> > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig | 14 +++++
> > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 1 +
> > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/efi.h | 3 +-
> > 9 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/zero-page.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/zero-page.rst
> > index 45aa9cceb4f1..f21905e61ade 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/zero-page.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/zero-page.rst
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ Offset/Size Proto Name Meaning
> > 060/010 ALL ist_info Intel SpeedStep (IST) BIOS support information
> > (struct ist_info)
> > 070/008 ALL acpi_rsdp_addr Physical address of ACPI RSDP table
> > +078/008 ALL unaccepted_memory Bitmap of unaccepted memory (1bit == 2M)
>
> Unaccepted memory is a generic EFI feature, and will need to be
> supported on other architectures as well.
>
> Could we perhaps use a EFI configuration table to pass the bitmap to
> the core kernel, instead of adding more cruft to this archaic header?
> That could be implemented in a arch-agnostic manner, even in cases
> where the bootloader is the agent that calls ExitBootServices(), as it
> would be the loader that allocates and populates the bitmap in that
> case.
Okay, that's a fair point.
Below is my take on this. It is on top of whole patchset. It seems to be
functional, but more testing is required.
While there I also removed hardcoded 1b == 2MB.
My EFI knowledge is rather superficial. I would be glad for feedback.
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/zero-page.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/zero-page.rst
index f21905e61ade..45aa9cceb4f1 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/x86/zero-page.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/zero-page.rst
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ Offset/Size Proto Name Meaning
060/010 ALL ist_info Intel SpeedStep (IST) BIOS support information
(struct ist_info)
070/008 ALL acpi_rsdp_addr Physical address of ACPI RSDP table
-078/008 ALL unaccepted_memory Bitmap of unaccepted memory (1bit == 2M)
080/010 ALL hd0_info hd0 disk parameter, OBSOLETE!!
090/010 ALL hd1_info hd1 disk parameter, OBSOLETE!!
0A0/010 ALL sys_desc_table System description table (struct sys_desc_table),
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
index cf475243b6d5..5b63628912da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/efi.h
@@ -105,6 +105,15 @@ struct efi_setup_data {
u64 reserved[8];
};
+struct efi_unaccepted_memory {
+ u32 version;
+ u32 unit_size;
+ u64 size;
+ u64 bitmap[];
+};
+
+extern struct efi_unaccepted_memory *unaccepted_table;
+
static inline int efi_guidcmp (efi_guid_t left, efi_guid_t right)
{
return memcmp(&left, &right, sizeof (efi_guid_t));
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c
index e6b92e822ddd..7d50aea0d6b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.c
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#include <linux/uuid.h>
#include "../cpuflags.h"
#include "bitmap.h"
+#include "efi.h"
#include "error.h"
#include "find.h"
#include "math.h"
@@ -12,8 +14,6 @@
#define PMD_SIZE (_AC(1, UL) << PMD_SHIFT)
#define PMD_MASK (~(PMD_SIZE - 1))
-extern struct boot_params *boot_params;
-
/*
* accept_memory() and process_unaccepted_memory() called from EFI stub which
* runs before decompresser and its early_tdx_detect().
@@ -57,66 +57,77 @@ static inline void __accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
*
* The function will never reach the bitmap_set() with zero bits to set.
*/
-void process_unaccepted_memory(struct boot_params *params, u64 start, u64 end)
+void process_unaccepted_memory(u64 start, u64 end)
{
+ u64 unit_size = unaccepted_table->unit_size;
+ u64 unit_mask = unaccepted_table->unit_size - 1;
+ u64 bitmap_size = unaccepted_table->size;
+
/*
* Ensure that at least one bit will be set in the bitmap by
- * immediately accepting all regions under 2*PMD_SIZE. This is
+ * immediately accepting all regions under 2*unit_size. This is
* imprecise and may immediately accept some areas that could
* have been represented in the bitmap. But, results in simpler
* code below
*
- * Consider case like this:
+ * Consider case like this (assuming unit_size == 2MB):
*
* | 4k | 2044k | 2048k |
* ^ 0x0 ^ 2MB ^ 4MB
*
* Only the first 4k has been accepted. The 0MB->2MB region can not be
* represented in the bitmap. The 2MB->4MB region can be represented in
- * the bitmap. But, the 0MB->4MB region is <2*PMD_SIZE and will be
+ * the bitmap. But, the 0MB->4MB region is <2*unit_size and will be
* immediately accepted in its entirety.
*/
- if (end - start < 2 * PMD_SIZE) {
+ if (end - start < 2 * unit_size) {
__accept_memory(start, end);
return;
}
/*
* No matter how the start and end are aligned, at least one unaccepted
- * PMD_SIZE area will remain to be marked in the bitmap.
+ * unit_size area will remain to be marked in the bitmap.
*/
- /* Immediately accept a <PMD_SIZE piece at the start: */
- if (start & ~PMD_MASK) {
- __accept_memory(start, round_up(start, PMD_SIZE));
- start = round_up(start, PMD_SIZE);
+ /* Immediately accept a <unit_size piece at the start: */
+ if (start & unit_mask) {
+ __accept_memory(start, round_up(start, unit_size));
+ start = round_up(start, unit_size);
}
- /* Immediately accept a <PMD_SIZE piece at the end: */
- if (end & ~PMD_MASK) {
- __accept_memory(round_down(end, PMD_SIZE), end);
- end = round_down(end, PMD_SIZE);
+ /* Immediately accept a <unit_size piece at the end: */
+ if (end & unit_mask) {
+ __accept_memory(round_down(end, unit_size), end);
+ end = round_down(end, unit_size);
+ }
+
+ /* Accept everything that cannot be recorded into the bitmap */
+ if (end > bitmap_size * unit_size * BITS_PER_BYTE) {
+ __accept_memory(bitmap_size * unit_size * BITS_PER_BYTE, end);
+ end = bitmap_size * unit_size * BITS_PER_BYTE;
}
/*
- * 'start' and 'end' are now both PMD-aligned.
+ * 'start' and 'end' are now both unit_size-aligned.
* Record the range as being unaccepted:
*/
- bitmap_set((unsigned long *)params->unaccepted_memory,
- start / PMD_SIZE, (end - start) / PMD_SIZE);
+ bitmap_set((unsigned long *)unaccepted_table->bitmap,
+ start / unit_size, (end - start) / unit_size);
}
void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
{
unsigned long range_start, range_end;
unsigned long *bitmap, bitmap_size;
+ u64 unit_size = unaccepted_table->unit_size;
- bitmap = (unsigned long *)boot_params->unaccepted_memory;
- range_start = start / PMD_SIZE;
- bitmap_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(end, PMD_SIZE);
+ bitmap = (unsigned long *)unaccepted_table->bitmap;
+ range_start = start / unit_size;
+ bitmap_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(end, unit_size);
for_each_set_bitrange_from(range_start, range_end, bitmap, bitmap_size) {
- __accept_memory(range_start * PMD_SIZE, range_end * PMD_SIZE);
+ __accept_memory(range_start * unit_size, range_end * unit_size);
bitmap_clear(bitmap, range_start, range_end - range_start);
}
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
index 186bfd53e042..f481f0b30873 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void *extract_kernel(void *rmode, memptr heap,
debug_putstr("\nDecompressing Linux... ");
- if (boot_params->unaccepted_memory) {
+ if (unaccepted_table) {
debug_putstr("Accepting memory... ");
accept_memory(__pa(output), __pa(output) + needed_size);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h
index 89fc91c61560..9f695bdde01c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h
@@ -3,9 +3,7 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY_H
#define _ASM_X86_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY_H
-struct boot_params;
-
-void process_unaccepted_memory(struct boot_params *params, u64 start, u64 num);
+void process_unaccepted_memory(u64 start, u64 num);
#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
index 630a54046af0..01d19fc22346 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ struct boot_params {
__u64 tboot_addr; /* 0x058 */
struct ist_info ist_info; /* 0x060 */
__u64 acpi_rsdp_addr; /* 0x070 */
- __u64 unaccepted_memory; /* 0x078 */
+ __u8 _pad3[8]; /* 0x078 */
__u8 hd0_info[16]; /* obsolete! */ /* 0x080 */
__u8 hd1_info[16]; /* obsolete! */ /* 0x090 */
struct sys_desc_table sys_desc_table; /* obsolete! */ /* 0x0a0 */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 483c36a28d2e..8ee6b756712f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/firmware-map.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
+#include <linux/efi.h>
#include <asm/e820/api.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>
@@ -1324,13 +1325,15 @@ void __init e820__memblock_setup(void)
* e820_table is not finalized and e820__end_of_ram_pfn() cannot be
* used to get correct RAM size.
*/
- if (boot_params.unaccepted_memory) {
+ if (efi.unaccepted != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) {
+ struct efi_unaccepted_memory *unaccepted;
unsigned long size;
- /* One bit per 2MB */
- size = DIV_ROUND_UP(e820__end_of_ram_pfn() * PAGE_SIZE,
- PMD_SIZE * BITS_PER_BYTE);
- memblock_reserve(boot_params.unaccepted_memory, size);
+ unaccepted = __va(efi.unaccepted);
+
+ size = sizeof(struct efi_unaccepted_memory);
+ size += unaccepted->size;
+ memblock_reserve(efi.unaccepted, size);
}
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/unaccepted_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/unaccepted_memory.c
index f61174d4c3cb..ec2b616ef32e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/unaccepted_memory.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/unaccepted_memory.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#include <linux/efi.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/pfn.h>
@@ -14,15 +15,19 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(unaccepted_memory_lock);
void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
{
+ struct efi_unaccepted_memory *unaccepted;
unsigned long range_start, range_end;
- unsigned long *bitmap;
- unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long flags, *bitmap;
+ u64 unit_size;
- if (!boot_params.unaccepted_memory)
+ if (efi.unaccepted == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
return;
- bitmap = __va(boot_params.unaccepted_memory);
- range_start = start / PMD_SIZE;
+ unaccepted = __va(efi.unaccepted);
+ unit_size = unaccepted->unit_size;
+ bitmap = (unsigned long *)unaccepted->bitmap;
+
+ range_start = start / unit_size;
/*
* load_unaligned_zeropad() can lead to unwanted loads across page
@@ -42,23 +47,25 @@ void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
* used:
*
* 1. Implicitly extend the range_contains_unaccepted_memory(start, end)
- * checks up to end+2M if 'end' is aligned on a 2M boundary.
+ * checks up to end+unit_size if 'end' is aligned on a unit_size
+ * boundary.
*
- * 2. Implicitly extend accept_memory(start, end) to end+2M if 'end' is
- * aligned on a 2M boundary. (immediately following this comment)
+ * 2. Implicitly extend accept_memory(start, end) to end+unit_size if
+ * 'end' is aligned on a unit_size boundary. (immediately following
+ * this comment)
*/
- if (!(end % PMD_SIZE))
- end += PMD_SIZE;
+ if (!(end % unit_size))
+ end += unit_size;
spin_lock_irqsave(&unaccepted_memory_lock, flags);
for_each_set_bitrange_from(range_start, range_end, bitmap,
- DIV_ROUND_UP(end, PMD_SIZE)) {
+ DIV_ROUND_UP(end, unit_size)) {
unsigned long len = range_end - range_start;
/* Platform-specific memory-acceptance call goes here */
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST)) {
- tdx_accept_memory(range_start * PMD_SIZE,
- range_end * PMD_SIZE);
+ tdx_accept_memory(range_start * unit_size,
+ range_end * unit_size);
} else {
panic("Cannot accept memory: unknown platform\n");
}
@@ -70,30 +77,33 @@ void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
bool range_contains_unaccepted_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
{
- unsigned long *bitmap;
- unsigned long flags;
+ struct efi_unaccepted_memory *unaccepted;
+ unsigned long flags, *bitmap;
bool ret = false;
+ u64 unit_size;
- if (!boot_params.unaccepted_memory)
+ if (efi.unaccepted == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
return 0;
- bitmap = __va(boot_params.unaccepted_memory);
+ unaccepted = __va(efi.unaccepted);
+ unit_size = unaccepted->unit_size;
+ bitmap = (unsigned long *)unaccepted->bitmap;
/*
* Also consider the unaccepted state of the *next* page. See fix #1 in
* the comment on load_unaligned_zeropad() in accept_memory().
*/
- if (!(end % PMD_SIZE))
- end += PMD_SIZE;
+ if (!(end % unit_size))
+ end += unit_size;
spin_lock_irqsave(&unaccepted_memory_lock, flags);
while (start < end) {
- if (test_bit(start / PMD_SIZE, bitmap)) {
+ if (test_bit(start / unit_size, bitmap)) {
ret = true;
break;
}
- start += PMD_SIZE;
+ start += unit_size;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&unaccepted_memory_lock, flags);
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
index 7dce06e419c5..e15a2005ed93 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ struct efi __read_mostly efi = {
#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_COCO_SECRET
.coco_secret = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
+ .unaccepted = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
+#endif
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(efi);
@@ -605,6 +608,9 @@ static const efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] __initconst = {
#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_COCO_SECRET
{LINUX_EFI_COCO_SECRET_AREA_GUID, &efi.coco_secret, "CocoSecret" },
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
+ {LINUX_EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEM_TABLE_GUID, &efi.unaccepted, "Unaccepted" },
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_GENERIC_STUB
{LINUX_EFI_SCREEN_INFO_TABLE_GUID, &screen_info_table },
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
index 1afe7b5b02e1..4953b40f30c3 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ const efi_system_table_t *efi_system_table;
const efi_dxe_services_table_t *efi_dxe_table;
u32 image_offset __section(".data");
static efi_loaded_image_t *image = NULL;
+struct efi_unaccepted_memory *unaccepted_table;
static efi_status_t
preserve_pci_rom_image(efi_pci_io_protocol_t *pci, struct pci_setup_rom **__rom)
@@ -621,7 +622,7 @@ setup_e820(struct boot_params *params, struct setup_data *e820ext, u32 e820ext_s
continue;
}
e820_type = E820_TYPE_RAM;
- process_unaccepted_memory(params, d->phys_addr,
+ process_unaccepted_memory(d->phys_addr,
d->phys_addr + PAGE_SIZE * d->num_pages);
break;
default:
@@ -692,12 +693,22 @@ static efi_status_t allocate_unaccepted_bitmap(struct boot_params *params,
__u32 nr_desc,
struct efi_boot_memmap *map)
{
- unsigned long *mem = NULL;
- u64 size, max_addr = 0;
+ efi_guid_t unaccepted_table_guid = LINUX_EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEM_TABLE_GUID;
+ u64 bitmap_size, max_addr = 0;
efi_status_t status;
bool found = false;
int i;
+ /* Check if the table is already installed */
+ unaccepted_table = get_efi_config_table(unaccepted_table_guid);
+ if (unaccepted_table) {
+ if (unaccepted_table->version != 0) {
+ efi_err("Unknown version of unaccepted memory tatble\n");
+ return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
+ }
+ return EFI_SUCCESS;
+ }
+
/* Check if there's any unaccepted memory and find the max address */
for (i = 0; i < nr_desc; i++) {
efi_memory_desc_t *d;
@@ -710,11 +721,6 @@ static efi_status_t allocate_unaccepted_bitmap(struct boot_params *params,
max_addr = d->phys_addr + d->num_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
}
- if (!found) {
- params->unaccepted_memory = 0;
- return EFI_SUCCESS;
- }
-
/*
* range_contains_unaccepted_memory() may need to check one 2M chunk
* beyond the end of RAM to deal with load_unaligned_zeropad(). Make
@@ -736,11 +742,26 @@ static efi_status_t allocate_unaccepted_bitmap(struct boot_params *params,
* The bitmap will be populated in setup_e820() according to the memory
* map after efi_exit_boot_services().
*/
- size = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_addr, PMD_SIZE * BITS_PER_BYTE);
- status = efi_allocate_pages(size, (unsigned long *)&mem, ULONG_MAX);
- if (status == EFI_SUCCESS) {
- memset(mem, 0, size);
- params->unaccepted_memory = (unsigned long)mem;
+ bitmap_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_addr, PMD_SIZE * BITS_PER_BYTE);
+
+ status = efi_bs_call(allocate_pool, EFI_LOADER_DATA,
+ sizeof(*unaccepted_table) + bitmap_size,
+ (void **)&unaccepted_table);
+ if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
+ efi_err("Failed to allocate unaccepted memory config table\n");
+ return status;
+ }
+
+ unaccepted_table->version = 0;
+ unaccepted_table->unit_size = PMD_SIZE;
+ unaccepted_table->size = bitmap_size;
+ memset(unaccepted_table->bitmap, 0, bitmap_size);
+
+ status = efi_bs_call(install_configuration_table,
+ &unaccepted_table_guid, unaccepted_table);
+ if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
+ efi_bs_call(free_pool, unaccepted_table);
+ efi_err("Failed to install unaccepted memory config table!\n");
}
return status;
diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
index efbe14641638..f765266a81b3 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi.h
@@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ void efi_native_runtime_setup(void);
#define LINUX_EFI_MOK_VARIABLE_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0xc451ed2b, 0x9694, 0x45d3, 0xba, 0xba, 0xed, 0x9f, 0x89, 0x88, 0xa3, 0x89)
#define LINUX_EFI_COCO_SECRET_AREA_GUID EFI_GUID(0xadf956ad, 0xe98c, 0x484c, 0xae, 0x11, 0xb5, 0x1c, 0x7d, 0x33, 0x64, 0x47)
#define LINUX_EFI_BOOT_MEMMAP_GUID EFI_GUID(0x800f683f, 0xd08b, 0x423a, 0xa2, 0x93, 0x96, 0x5c, 0x3c, 0x6f, 0xe2, 0xb4)
+#define LINUX_EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEM_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0xd5d1de3c, 0x105c, 0x44f9, 0x9e, 0xa9, 0xbc, 0xef, 0x98, 0x12, 0x00, 0x31)
#define RISCV_EFI_BOOT_PROTOCOL_GUID EFI_GUID(0xccd15fec, 0x6f73, 0x4eec, 0x83, 0x95, 0x3e, 0x69, 0xe4, 0xb9, 0x40, 0xbf)
@@ -535,6 +536,13 @@ struct efi_boot_memmap {
efi_memory_desc_t map[];
};
+struct efi_unaccepted_memory {
+ u32 version;
+ u32 unit_size;
+ u64 size;
+ u64 bitmap[];
+};
+
/*
* Architecture independent structure for describing a memory map for the
* benefit of efi_memmap_init_early(), and for passing context between
@@ -637,6 +645,7 @@ extern struct efi {
unsigned long tpm_final_log; /* TPM2 Final Events Log table */
unsigned long mokvar_table; /* MOK variable config table */
unsigned long coco_secret; /* Confidential computing secret table */
+ unsigned long unaccepted;
efi_get_time_t *get_time;
efi_set_time_t *set_time;
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists