[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4a76d54-c264-4ed8-8784-93ea392615e8@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 21:02:37 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Frank <Frank.Sae@...or-comm.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: Let drivers check Wake-on-LAN
status
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 11:43:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> A few PHY drivers are currently attempting to not suspend the PHY when
> Wake-on-LAN is enabled, however that code is not currently executing at
> all due to an early check in phy_suspend().
>
> This prevents PHY drivers from making an appropriate decisions and put
> the hardware into a low power state if desired.
>
> In order to allow the PHY framework to always call into the PHY driver's
> ->suspend routine whether Wake-on-LAN is enabled or not, provide a
> phydev::wol_enabled boolean that tracks whether the PHY or the attached
> MAC has Wake-on-LAN enabled.
>
> If phydev::wol_enabled then the PHY shall not prevent its own
> Wake-on-LAN detection logic from working and shall not prevent the
> Ethernet MAC from receiving packets for matching.
Hi Florian
Did you look at using late_suspend for this? Then there would not be
any need to change all these drivers which are happy as they are.
It actually looks like late_suspend is what you want anyway, when you
say you want to turn the matching hardware on as late as possible.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists