linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] PCI: hv: Use async probing to reduce boot time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZFtUgCVaneGVKBsW@lpieralisi>
Date:   Wed, 10 May 2023 10:23:28 +0200
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To:     Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        haiyangz@...rosoft.com, jakeo@...rosoft.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        kw@...ux.com, kys@...rosoft.com, leon@...nel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, mikelley@...rosoft.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, saeedm@...dia.com,
        wei.liu@...nel.org, longli@...rosoft.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
        ssengar@...rosoft.com, helgaas@...nel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        josete@...rosoft.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] PCI: hv: Use async probing to reduce boot time

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 07:40:37PM -0700, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> Commit 414428c5da1c ("PCI: hv: Lock PCI bus on device eject") added
> pci_lock_rescan_remove() and pci_unlock_rescan_remove() in
> create_root_hv_pci_bus() and in hv_eject_device_work() to address the
> race between create_root_hv_pci_bus() and hv_eject_device_work(), but it
> turns that grabing the pci_rescan_remove_lock mutex is not enough:
> refer to the earlier fix "PCI: hv: Add a per-bus mutex state_lock".

This is meaningless for a commit log reader, there is nothing to
refer to.

> Now with hbus->state_lock and other fixes, the race is resolved, so

"other fixes" is meaningless too.

Explain the problem and how you fix it (this patch should be split
because the Subject does not represent what you are doing precisely,
see below).

> remove pci_{lock,unlock}_rescan_remove() in create_root_hv_pci_bus():
> this removes the serialization in hv_pci_probe() and hence allows
> async-probing (PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS) to work.
> 
> Add the async-probing flag to hv_pci_drv.

Adding the asynchronous probing should be a separate patch and
I don't think you should send it to stable kernels straight away
because a) it is not a fix b) it can trigger further regressions.

> pci_{lock,unlock}_rescan_remove() in hv_eject_device_work() and in
> hv_pci_remove() are still kept: according to the comment before
> drivers/pci/probe.c: static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_rescan_remove_lock),
> "PCI device removal routines should always be executed under this mutex".

This patch should be split, first thing is to fix and document what
you are changing for pci_{lock,unlock}_rescan_remove() then add
asynchronous probing.

Lorenzo

> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> 
> v2:
>   No change to the patch body.
>   Improved the commit message [Michael Kelley]
>   Added Cc:stable
> 
> v3:
>   Added Michael's and Long Li's Reviewed-by.
>   Fixed a typo in the commit message: grubing -> grabing [Thanks, Michael!]
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> index 3ae2f99dea8c2..2ea2b1b8a4c9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -2312,12 +2312,16 @@ static int create_root_hv_pci_bus(struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus)
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
>  
> -	pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> +	/*
> +	 * pci_lock_rescan_remove() and pci_unlock_rescan_remove() are
> +	 * unnecessary here, because we hold the hbus->state_lock, meaning
> +	 * hv_eject_device_work() and pci_devices_present_work() can't race
> +	 * with create_root_hv_pci_bus().
> +	 */
>  	hv_pci_assign_numa_node(hbus);
>  	pci_bus_assign_resources(bridge->bus);
>  	hv_pci_assign_slots(hbus);
>  	pci_bus_add_devices(bridge->bus);
> -	pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
>  	hbus->state = hv_pcibus_installed;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -4003,6 +4007,9 @@ static struct hv_driver hv_pci_drv = {
>  	.remove		= hv_pci_remove,
>  	.suspend	= hv_pci_suspend,
>  	.resume		= hv_pci_resume,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
> +	},
>  };
>  
>  static void __exit exit_hv_pci_drv(void)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>