[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4c73c29-b604-4b0c-92bb-000369b0a5d7@kili.mountain>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 19:48:16 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
Cc: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: silence some uninitialized variable warnings
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 08:57:03AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 5/3/2023 4:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Smatch complains that these are not initialized if get_cntl_version()
> > fails but we still print them in the debug message. Not the end of
> > the world, but true enough. Let's just initialize them to a dummy value
> > to make the checker happy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
>
> Thanks for the cleanup.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
>
> Could use a fixes tag
The fixes tag thing could have gone either way. It's really minor.
> and also I'd prefer to maintain the style of sorting
> the variable declaration lines by line length. Given the minor nature of
> these nits, I plan to address them.
Thanks!
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists