[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230515070156.1790181-3-haowenchao2@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 15:01:56 +0800
From: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
To: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linfeilong@...wei.com>, <louhongxiang@...wei.com>,
Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: core: decrease scsi_device's iorequest_cnt if dispatch failed
If scsi_dispatch_cmd() failed, the SCSI command was not sent to the target,
scsi_queue_rq() would return BLK_STS_RESOURCE and the related request
would be requeued. The timeout of this request would not fire, no one would
increase iodone_cnt.
The above flow would result the iodone_cnt smaller than iorequest_cnt.
So decrease the iorequest_cnt if dispatch failed to workaround the issue.
Link:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/8e0f2d31-e6ff-ec4a-3974-450560ad49c5@huawei.com/T/#t
Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 03964b26f3f2..0226c9279cef 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -1485,6 +1485,7 @@ static int scsi_dispatch_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
*/
SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, cmd,
"queuecommand : device blocked\n"));
+ atomic_dec(&cmd->device->iorequest_cnt);
return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY;
}
@@ -1517,6 +1518,7 @@ static int scsi_dispatch_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
trace_scsi_dispatch_cmd_start(cmd);
rtn = host->hostt->queuecommand(host, cmd);
if (rtn) {
+ atomic_dec(&cmd->device->iorequest_cnt);
trace_scsi_dispatch_cmd_error(cmd, rtn);
if (rtn != SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY &&
rtn != SCSI_MLQUEUE_TARGET_BUSY)
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists