[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230517154525.ljoamjlfhpejtizm@viti.kaiser.cx>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 17:45:25 +0200
From: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, soc@...nel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] ARM: imx: remove unused mx25_revision()
Thus wrote Arnd Bergmann (arnd@...db.de):
> I think either way is ok to address the warning. If we wanted to do this
> properly, the mx{25,27,31,35,5}_revision functions could all be removed
> and the logic hooked up to imx_set_soc_revision() in the same way that
> they already use mxc_set_cpu_type() for drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx.c.
> I'll leave it up to you, if you want to merge Martin's patches or
> a replacement for the soc-imx driver through the imx tree for 6.5,
> I'll drop my patch from this series, otherwise I'll keep it for now
> and we can still do it better at later point.
I suggest we merge my patches for imx25 first and then clean up all the
older imx families to use the common functions.
I've just rebased the patches against today's linux-next. My understanding
is that they have to go through the clk tree.
Thanks,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists