[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZG/WF22mB4PiJdl4@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 21:41:43 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64/sysreg: More conversions to automatic
generation
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:36:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Continue working through the register defintions, converting them to
> automatic generation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Also convert OSECCR_EL1, OSDTRRX_EL1 and OSDTRTX_EL1 instead of
> dropping them.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230419-arm64-syreg-gen-v1-0-936cd769cb9e@kernel.org
>
> ---
> Mark Brown (7):
> arm64/sysreg: Convert MDCCINT_EL1 to automatic register generation
> arm64/sysreg: Convert MDSCR_EL1 to automatic register generation
> arm64/sysreg: Standardise naming of bitfield constants in OSL[AS]R_EL1
> arm64/sysreg: Convert OSLAR_EL1 to automatic generation
> arm64/sysreg: Convert OSDTRRX_EL1 to automatic generation
> arm64/sysreg: Convert OSDTRTX_EL1 to automatic generation
> arm64/sysreg: Convert OSECCR_EL1 to automatic generation
Besides the one comment I had:
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
I imagine these will go through the arm64 tree right? The KVM diff is
miniscule.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists