[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29e4b23d-27cb-4101-bfe9-c6b412222578@t-8ch.de>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 09:38:04 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
To: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
Cc: w@....eu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] tools/nolibc: sys_gettimeofday: riscv: use
__NR_clock_gettime64 for rv32
On 2023-05-25 02:03:32+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> rv32 uses the generic include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h and it has no
> __NR_gettimeofday and __NR_clock_gettime after kernel commit d4c08b9776b3
> ("riscv: Use latest system call ABI"), use __NR_clock_gettime64 instead.
>
> This code is based on src/time/gettimeofday.c of musl and
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_gettime.c of glibc.
>
> Both __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 are added for
> sys_gettimeofday() for they share most of the code.
>
> Notes:
>
> * Both tv and tz are not directly passed to kernel clock_gettime*
> syscalls, so, it isn't able to check the pointer automatically with the
> get_user/put_user helpers just like kernel gettimeofday syscall does.
> instead, we emulate (but not completely) such checks in our new
> __NR_clock_gettime* branch of nolibc.
>
> * kernel clock_gettime* syscalls can not get tz info, just like musl and
> glibc do, we set tz to zero to avoid a random number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
> ---
> tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> index 2642b380c6aa..ad38cc3856be 100644
> --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>
> #include "arch.h"
> #include "errno.h"
> +#include "string.h"
> #include "types.h"
>
>
> @@ -51,6 +52,11 @@
> * should not be placed here.
> */
>
> +/*
> + * This is the first address past the end of the text segment (the program code).
> + */
> +
> +extern char etext;
>
> /*
> * int brk(void *addr);
> @@ -554,7 +560,47 @@ long getpagesize(void)
> static __attribute__((unused))
> int sys_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz)
> {
> +#ifdef __NR_gettimeofday
> return my_syscall2(__NR_gettimeofday, tv, tz);
> +#elif defined(__NR_clock_gettime) || defined(__NR_clock_gettime64)
> +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime
> + struct timespec ts;
> +#else
> + struct timespec64 ts;
> +#define __NR_clock_gettime __NR_clock_gettime64
> +#endif
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* make sure tv pointer is at least after code segment */
> + if (tv != NULL && (char *)tv <= &etext)
> + return -EFAULT;
To me the weird etext comparisions don't seem to be worth it, to be
honest.
> +
> + /* set tz to zero to avoid random number */
> + if (tz != NULL) {
> + if ((char *)tz > &etext)
> + memset(tz, 0, sizeof(struct timezone));
> + else
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + if (tv == NULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = my_syscall2(__NR_clock_gettime, CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + tv->tv_sec = (time_t) ts.tv_sec;
> +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime64
Nitpick:
While this ifdef works and is correct its logic is a bit indirect.
If it is copied to some other function in the future it may be incorrect
there.
Without the #ifdef the compiler should still be able to optimize the
code away.
> + if (tv->tv_sec != ts.tv_sec)
> + return -EOVERFLOW;
> +#endif
> +
> + tv->tv_usec = ts.tv_nsec / 1000;
> + return 0;
> +#else
> +#error None of __NR_gettimeofday, __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 defined, cannot implement sys_gettimeofday()
> +#endif
> }
>
> static __attribute__((unused))
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists