[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5AKYo+9FwNMc+s35ockjK2HET4NDAAMYdnZkBs6A1-Wnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 09:13:09 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ajayagarwal@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Provide deinit callback for i.MX
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 8:55 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> Well, they're both issues - if someone unloads or unbinds the driver we
> can still trigger this, even if the probe succeeded.
Yes, for your change:
Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
> > It should not fail to probe. At least, this was the original intention
> > with Rob's commit:
>
> > 886a9c134755 ("PCI: dwc: Move link handling into common code")
>
> > + return 0;
> >
> > err_remove_edma:
> > dw_pcie_edma_remove(pci);
>
> I have no idea about doing this, all the PCI on the board that I care
> about seems to work fine (and worked fine even with the failure, I'm not
> sure this is being generated by a link that's in use).
The probe failure when link is not up happens in linux-next due to commit:
da56a1bfbab5 ("PCI: dwc: Wait for link up only if link is started")
Prior this commit the PCI driver probed successfully even when the
link was down.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists