linux-kernel - [PATCH] drm/radeon: ERROR: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:03:25 +0800
From:   sunran001@...suo.com
To:     airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: ERROR: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)"

Fix five occurrences of the checkpatch.pl error:
ERROR: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)"

Signed-off-by: Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c | 10 +++++-----
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
index e0214cf1b43b..a16590c6247f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ int radeon_info_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void 
*data, struct drm_file *filp)
              DRM_DEBUG_KMS("timestamp is r6xx+ only!\n");
              return -EINVAL;
          }
-        value = (uint32_t*)&value64;
+        value = (uint32_t *)&value64;
          value_size = sizeof(uint64_t);
          value64 = radeon_get_gpu_clock_counter(rdev);
          break;
@@ -543,18 +543,18 @@ int radeon_info_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void 
*data, struct drm_file *filp)
          *value = rdev->vce.fb_version;
          break;
      case RADEON_INFO_NUM_BYTES_MOVED:
-        value = (uint32_t*)&value64;
+        value = (uint32_t *)&value64;
          value_size = sizeof(uint64_t);
          value64 = atomic64_read(&rdev->num_bytes_moved);
          break;
      case RADEON_INFO_VRAM_USAGE:
-        value = (uint32_t*)&value64;
+        value = (uint32_t *)&value64;
          value_size = sizeof(uint64_t);
          man = ttm_manager_type(&rdev->mman.bdev, TTM_PL_VRAM);
          value64 = ttm_resource_manager_usage(man);
          break;
      case RADEON_INFO_GTT_USAGE:
-        value = (uint32_t*)&value64;
+        value = (uint32_t *)&value64;
          value_size = sizeof(uint64_t);
          man = ttm_manager_type(&rdev->mman.bdev, TTM_PL_TT);
          value64 = ttm_resource_manager_usage(man);
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ int radeon_info_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void 
*data, struct drm_file *filp)
          DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid request %d\n", info->request);
          return -EINVAL;
      }
-    if (copy_to_user(value_ptr, (char*)value, value_size)) {
+    if (copy_to_user(value_ptr, (char *)value, value_size)) {
          DRM_ERROR("copy_to_user %s:%u\n", __func__, __LINE__);
          return -EFAULT;
      }