linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V3 5/9] x86/hyperv: Use vmmcall to implement Hyper-V hypercall in sev-snp enlightened guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BYAPR21MB16880B1657BA4C907D002730D700A@BYAPR21MB1688.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:29:12 +0000
From:   "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To:     Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 5/9] x86/hyperv: Use vmmcall to implement Hyper-V
 hypercall in sev-snp enlightened guest

From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 6:47 AM
> 
> On 7/26/2023 11:44 AM, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> >> index 2fa38e9f6207..025eda129d99 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> >> @@ -64,12 +64,12 @@ static inline u64 hv_do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input,
> void *output)
> >>   	if (!hv_hypercall_pg)
> >>   		return U64_MAX;
> >>
> >> -	__asm__ __volatile__("mov %4, %%r8\n"
> >> -			     CALL_NOSPEC
> >> +	__asm__ __volatile__("mov %[output], %%r8\n"
> >> +			     ALTERNATIVE("vmmcall", CALL_NOSPEC, X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES)
> > Since this code is for SEV-SNP, what's the thinking behind using
> > X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES in the ALTERNATIVE statements?   Don't you need
> > to use X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP (which is being added in another patch set that
> > Boris Petkov pointed out).
> 
> Hi Michael:
> 	Thanks for your review. The patch mentioned by Boris has not been
> merged and so still use X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES here. We may replace the
> feature flag with X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP after it's upstreamed.
> 

Just so I'm clear, is it true that in an SEV-SNP VM, the CPUID flags for
SEV-ES *and* SEV-SNP are set?  That would seem to be necessary for
your approach to work.

I wonder if it would be better to take the patch from Brijesh Singh
that adds X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP and add it to your patch set (with
Brijesh's agreement, of course).  That patch is small and straightforward.

> >
> > Also, does this patch depend on Peter Zijlstra's patch to support nested
> > ALTERNATIVE statements?  If so, that needs to be called out, probably in
> > the cover letter.  Peter's patch doesn't yet appear in linux-next.
> >
> 
> It may work without Peterz's patch. Please see
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/6/27/520
> Peterz's patch optimizes ALTERNATIVE_n implementation with nested
> expression.

OK, good.

Michael