[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c0a7f12-10d2-4a07-a07f-67ec0d39b279@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 14:21:22 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for
fallback
On 22.03.2023 18:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Changes since v2
> ================
> 1. Split fixes to separate patchset which is now dependency:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230322173559.809805-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/T/#t
> 2. Add Ack
> 3. No other changes, as discussion with Dmitry did not reach conclusion on incompatibility.
>
> Changes since v1
> ================
> 1. Rebase
> 2. Make msm8994 fallback for several variants, not msm8953, because the latter
> actually might take some clocks.
> 3. Two new patches for SDX55.
> 4. Minor corrections in bindings style.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230202161856.385825-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
>
> Description
> ===========
>
> If entire approach is accepted (and correct), there are no dependencies and
> patches can be picked independently. Although the best in the same cycle, so
> there will be no new `dtbs_check` warnings.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Looks like this was only partially merged, resulting in schema warnings
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists