linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for fallback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <38fbb9d1-f263-2ec1-a3d8-4b09a26eaf2d@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 5 Aug 2023 20:46:41 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for
 fallback

On 05/08/2023 14:21, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 22.03.2023 18:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Changes since v2
>> ================
>> 1. Split fixes to separate patchset which is now dependency:
>>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230322173559.809805-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/T/#t
>> 2. Add Ack
>> 3. No other changes, as discussion with Dmitry did not reach conclusion on incompatibility.
>>
>> Changes since v1
>> ================
>> 1. Rebase
>> 2. Make msm8994 fallback for several variants, not msm8953, because the latter
>>    actually might take some clocks.
>> 3. Two new patches for SDX55.
>> 4. Minor corrections in bindings style.
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230202161856.385825-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
>>
>> Description
>> ===========
>>
>> If entire approach is accepted (and correct), there are no dependencies and
>> patches can be picked independently.  Although the best in the same cycle, so
>> there will be no new `dtbs_check` warnings.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> Looks like this was only partially merged, resulting in schema warnings

There was discussion/disagreement about the bindings. DTS was applied,
thus it's partially limbo state...

Best regards,
Krzysztof