linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for fallback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <63b2f0a1-548f-4a5c-3b11-df324e4edad5@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 27 Aug 2023 14:17:31 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for
 fallback

On 05/08/2023 20:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/08/2023 14:21, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 22.03.2023 18:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Changes since v2
>>> ================
>>> 1. Split fixes to separate patchset which is now dependency:
>>>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230322173559.809805-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/T/#t
>>> 2. Add Ack
>>> 3. No other changes, as discussion with Dmitry did not reach conclusion on incompatibility.
>>>
>>> Changes since v1
>>> ================
>>> 1. Rebase
>>> 2. Make msm8994 fallback for several variants, not msm8953, because the latter
>>>    actually might take some clocks.
>>> 3. Two new patches for SDX55.
>>> 4. Minor corrections in bindings style.
>>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230202161856.385825-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
>>>
>>> Description
>>> ===========
>>>
>>> If entire approach is accepted (and correct), there are no dependencies and
>>> patches can be picked independently.  Although the best in the same cycle, so
>>> there will be no new `dtbs_check` warnings.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>> Looks like this was only partially merged, resulting in schema warnings
> 
> There was discussion/disagreement about the bindings. DTS was applied,
> thus it's partially limbo state...

Anyone has any ideas what to do with this stuff? DTS was applied, even
though bindings were discussed. Since some time we have tons of warnings
because of this.

Maybe let's just go with my original patchset?

Best regards,
Krzysztof