[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZNMoVgO7mEDV07OJ@sunil-laptop>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 11:17:02 +0530
From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 20/21] RISC-V: ACPI: Create PLIC platform device
Hi Conor,
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 09:41:45AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 11:29:15PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > Since PLIC needs to be a platform device
>
> For the unwashed, why does the PLCI need to be a platform device?
> (And while you're at that, please try to make use of the extra ~20
> characters per line that you can use here.)
>
Sure, let me add more details and use extra characters.
> > probe the
> > MADT and create platform devices for each PLIC in the
> > system. Use software node framework for the fwnode
> > which allows to create properties and hence the
> > actual irqchip driver doesn't need to do anything
> > different for ACPI vs DT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
>
> > +static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_plic_create_fwnode(struct acpi_madt_plic *plic)
> > +{
> > + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, *parent_fwnode;
> > + struct riscv_irqchip_list *plic_element;
> > + struct software_node_ref_args *refs;
> > + struct property_entry props[8] = {};
> > + int nr_contexts;
> > +
> > + props[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("riscv,gsi-base", plic->gsi_base);
> > + props[1] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("riscv,ndev", plic->num_irqs);
> > + props[2] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("riscv,max_prio", plic->max_prio);
>
> My OCD wants to know why this gets an _ but the others have a -.
>
It should be -. But with Marc's recommendation, this is no longer
required.
Thanks!
Sunil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists