[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOiHx==NiPG2GdZNrJn5hPEdi70Spe9Kc9CHO5NjnATAjCgUsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:19:14 +0200
From: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
To: Artem Chernyshev <artem.chernyshev@...-soft.ru>
Cc: Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcm80211: brcmsmac: phy_cmn: Remove unreachable code
On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 at 23:31, Artem Chernyshev
<artem.chernyshev@...-soft.ru> wrote:
>
> Since wlc_phy_txpwr_srom_read_nphy() in wlc_phy_attach_nphy()
> can not return false it's impossible to get true value in this
> if statement
If they can only return true, then maybe their return types should be
changed to void as well? No point in returning a value when the only
caller is ignoring it.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Artem Chernyshev <artem.chernyshev@...-soft.ru>
Regards,
Jonas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists