[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f2d647b-9972-deb9-e96f-779d2564ceee@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:28:56 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Om Prakash Singh <quic_omprsing@...cinc.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: crypto: qcom,prng: document SM8550
On 22/08/2023 16:54, Om Prakash Singh wrote:
> PRNG Block on most of newer target from Qualcomm have some configuration
> where clock is configured by security firmware.
>
> Adding separate compatible string for each platform is overhead.
I don't think PRNG is here different than others and for all others we
expect it. I understand that this is an overhead, like every work is
overhead.
>
> We need to introduce common compatible string that can be used for all
> platforms with same configuration.
It is already introduced, isn't it?
>
> I would suggest to use "qcom,rng-ee" for newer platform, dropping "p"
> also signifies it is not a Pseudo Random Number Generator.
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists