[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230828194010.GF17083@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 22:40:10 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: rfoss@...nel.org, todor.too@...il.com, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
andrey.konovalov@...aro.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/15] media: qcom: camss: Capture VFE CSID dependency
in a helper function
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:37:44PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 28/08/2023 19:47, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Bryan,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 11:44:36AM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> >> From sdm845 onwards we need to ensure the VFE is powered on prior to
> >> switching on the CSID.
> >
> > Based on the discussions with Konrad in the mail thread, I would record
> > here the reason for this requirement.
> >
> > What happens if you unconditionally power up the VFE prior to switching
> > the CSID on ? Will this break something on platforms older than SDM845 ?
>
> vfe->power_count will bump and you will be fine.
Then maybe that would be a simpler solution than having a
device-specific power sequence ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists