[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1849f80f-c717-557e-056a-795dae7e0c32@infotecs.ru>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 06:55:20 +0000
From: Gavrilov Ilia <Ilia.Gavrilov@...otecs.ru>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lvc-project@...uxtesting.org" <lvc-project@...uxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: igmp: Remove redundant comparison in
igmp_mcf_get_next()
On 8/29/23 05:45, David Ahern wrote:
> On 8/28/23 3:01 AM, Gavrilov Ilia wrote:
>> The 'state->im' value will always be non-zero after
>> the 'while' statement, so the check can be removed.
>>
>> Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center
>> (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gavrilov Ilia <Ilia.Gavrilov@...otecs.ru>
>> ---
>> net/ipv4/igmp.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/igmp.c b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> index 48ff5f13e797..6ebf06886527 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/igmp.c
>> @@ -2943,8 +2943,6 @@ static struct ip_sf_list *igmp_mcf_get_next(struct seq_file *seq, struct ip_sf_l
>> continue;
>> state->im = rcu_dereference(state->idev->mc_list);
>> }
>> - if (!state->im)
>> - break;
>> spin_lock_bh(&state->im->lock);
>> psf = state->im->sources;
>> }
>
> Same with this one: agree the check is not needed, but I also believe it
> does not need to be backported. Since net-next is closed, resubmit after
> 9/11.
>
> --
> pw-bot: defer
I'll resend it after 9/11.
Thank you for the review!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists