[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc618e8c-f8b-c339-9aa6-1d2c2865b42e@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 15:22:57 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Wieczor-Retman, Maciej" <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"Wieczor-Retman, Maciej" <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] selftests/kvm: Replace attribute with macro
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Wieczor-Retman, Maciej wrote:
> The __printf() macro is used in many tools in the linux kernel to
> validate the format specifiers in functions that use printf. Some
> selftests use it without putting it in a macro definition and some tests
> import the kselftests.h header.
"Some" and yet this only converts one? Please be more precise in the
wording.
> Use __printf() attribute instead of the full attribute since the macro
> is inside kselftests.h and the header is already imported.
IMO, this would be enough:
Use __printf() from kselftests.h instead of the full attribute.
Was there a reason why you didn't convert mm/pkey-helpers.h one?
--
i.
> Signed-off-by: Wieczor-Retman, Maciej <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
> index a6e9f215ce70..710a8a78e8ce 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static inline int _no_printf(const char *format, ...) { return 0; }
> #define pr_info(...) _no_printf(__VA_ARGS__)
> #endif
>
> -void print_skip(const char *fmt, ...) __attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)));
> +void __printf(1, 2) print_skip(const char *fmt, ...);
> #define __TEST_REQUIRE(f, fmt, ...) \
> do { \
> if (!(f)) \
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists