[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230904104856.GE11802@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 12:48:56 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: David Wang <00107082@....com>
Cc: fw@...len.de, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] samples/bpf: Add sample usage for BPF_PROG_TYPE_NETFILTER
David Wang <00107082@....com> wrote:
> This sample code implements a simple ipv4
> blacklist via the new bpf type BPF_PROG_TYPE_NETFILTER,
> which was introduced in 6.4.
>
> The bpf program drops package if destination ip address
> hits a match in the map of type BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE,
>
> The userspace code would load the bpf program,
> attach it to netfilter's FORWARD/OUTPUT hook,
> and then write ip patterns into the bpf map.
Thanks, I think its good to have this.
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/netfilter_ip4_blacklist.bpf.c b/samples/bpf/netfilter_ip4_blacklist.bpf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d315d64fda7f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/samples/bpf/netfilter_ip4_blacklist.bpf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +
> +
> +#define NF_DROP 0
> +#define NF_ACCEPT 1
If you are interested, you could send a patch for nf-next that
makes the uapi headers expose this as enum, AFAIU that would make
the verdict nanes available via vmlinux.h.
> + /* search p->daddr in trie */
> + key.prefixlen = 32;
> + key.data = p->daddr;
> + pvalue = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&ipv4_lpm_map, &key);
> + if (pvalue) {
> + /* cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe */
> + bpf_printk("rule matched with %d...\n", *pvalue);
If you are interested you could send a patch that adds a kfunc to
nf_bpf_link that exposes nf_log_packet() to bpf.
nf_log_packet has a terrible api, I suggest to have the kfunc take
'struct nf_hook_state *' instead of 6+ members of that struct as
argument.
Thanks for the example.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists