linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Move snd_hdac_i915_init to before probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 08:55:08 +0200
From:   Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Move snd_hdac_i915_init to
 before probe_work.

On 10/2/2023 6:52 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Now that we can use -EPROBE_DEFER, it's no longer required to spin off
> the snd_hdac_i915_init into a workqueue. It's likely the whole workqueue
> can be destroyed, but I don't have the means to test this.
> 
> Removing the workqueue would simplify init even further, but is left
> as exercise for the reviewer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
> ---

Isn't the convention that your Signed-off should be last when you are 
sending the patches? Or does it only apply to Signed-off lines 
themselves and other lines can be anywhere?