linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: rename push to emulate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231009092054.556935-2-julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de>
Date:   Mon,  9 Oct 2023 11:20:54 +0200
From:   Julian Stecklina <julian.stecklina@...erus-technology.de>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     Julian Stecklina <julian.stecklina@...erus-technology.de>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: rename push to emulate_push for consistency

push and emulate_pop are counterparts. Rename push to emulate_push and
harmonize its function signature with emulate_pop. This should remove
a bit of cognitive load when reading this code.

Signed-off-by: Julian Stecklina <julian.stecklina@...erus-technology.de>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 86d0ee9f1a6a..1b42d85694c2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -1819,22 +1819,23 @@ static int writeback(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, struct operand *op)
 	return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
 }
 
-static int push(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *data, int bytes)
+static int emulate_push(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, const void *data,
+			int len)
 {
 	struct segmented_address addr;
 
-	rsp_increment(ctxt, -bytes);
+	rsp_increment(ctxt, -len);
 	addr.ea = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) & stack_mask(ctxt);
 	addr.seg = VCPU_SREG_SS;
 
-	return segmented_write(ctxt, addr, data, bytes);
+	return segmented_write(ctxt, addr, data, len);
 }
 
 static int em_push(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 {
 	/* Disable writeback. */
 	ctxt->dst.type = OP_NONE;
-	return push(ctxt, &ctxt->src.val, ctxt->op_bytes);
+	return emulate_push(ctxt, &ctxt->src.val, ctxt->op_bytes);
 }
 
 static int emulate_pop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
@@ -1920,7 +1921,7 @@ static int em_enter(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 		return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
 
 	rbp = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP);
-	rc = push(ctxt, &rbp, stack_size(ctxt));
+	rc = emulate_push(ctxt, &rbp, stack_size(ctxt));
 	if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
 		return rc;
 	assign_masked(reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP), reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP),
-- 
2.40.1