linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] hte: Improve GPIO handling and other cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:04:23 -0700
From:   Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        timestamp@...ts.linux.dev, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] hte: Improve GPIO handling and other cleanups

On 10/11/23 3:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:33:51AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:18 PM Andy Shevchenko
>> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a series provides a new API to GPIO library (so far only
>>> available in the GPIO tree), and respective update to the Tegra
>>> HTE driver. On top a couple of other cleaups (patches 3 & 4, they
>>> can be applied separately).
>>>
>>> Patch 2 inherited tags from its respective discussion thread [1],
>>> but I believe the Tested-by needs to be confirmed again.
>>>
>>> Due to dependencies this either should be applied to the GPIO tree,
>>> or to the HTE when GPIO updates land the upstream (optionally with
>>> the first patch be applied even now to the GPIO tree independently).
>>>
>>> Another option is to have an immutable branch or tag, but I assume
>>> that was discussed and rejected (?) in [1].
>>
>> The series looks good to me. I'd like to take patches 1 and 2 through
>> the GPIO tree once v2 is out. This way we could potentially remove
>> gpiochip_find() for v6.7 already.
> 
> It would be nice to see it being removed sooner than later!
> I'm waiting for the test results by Dipen, I'll send the v2
> ASAP if tests pass.
> 
Reviewed-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>
After correcting typo manually
Tested-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>