[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbEzT-VWOP26oDWc7YE=t_wNOJKo=CfQxZ-vk5Rsmzt8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:43:34 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, timestamp@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] hte: Improve GPIO handling and other cleanups
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:18 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> This is a series provides a new API to GPIO library (so far only
> available in the GPIO tree), and respective update to the Tegra
> HTE driver. On top a couple of other cleaups (patches 3 & 4, they
> can be applied separately).
>
> Patch 2 inherited tags from its respective discussion thread [1],
> but I believe the Tested-by needs to be confirmed again.
>
> Due to dependencies this either should be applied to the GPIO tree,
> or to the HTE when GPIO updates land the upstream (optionally with
> the first patch be applied even now to the GPIO tree independently).
>
> Another option is to have an immutable branch or tag, but I assume
> that was discussed and rejected (?) in [1].
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20230905185309.131295-15-brgl@bgdev.pl/ [1]
> Cc: Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
This is good stuff. The series:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists