lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTZDocwUP9PU39Mg@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:57:53 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 5/6] tracing: Move readpos from seq_buf to
 trace_seq

On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 06:27:18PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
> 
> To make seq_buf more lightweight as a string buf, move the readpos member
> from seq_buf to its container, trace_seq.  That puts the responsibility
> of maintaining the readpos entirely in the tracing code.  If some future
> users want to package up the readpos with a seq_buf, we can define a
> new struct then.

> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20231020033545.2587554-2-willy@infradead.org
> 

If we want Link: to be recognized as a tag, we probably should remove the blank
line. Maybe new versions of b4 support that, but not all maintainers use it and
AFAIK the convention was to have no blank lines in the tag block.

> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ