[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dccdd1e1-0ae9-448a-aa2f-aa3f7b988559@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:15:15 +0300
From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: VMX: Use BT+JNC, i.e. EFLAGS.CF to select
VMRESUME vs. VMLAUNCH
On 24.10.23 г. 11:08 ч., Pawan Gupta wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>
> Use EFLAGS.CF instead of EFLAGS.ZF to track whether to use VMRESUME versus
> VMLAUNCH. Freeing up EFLAGS.ZF will allow doing VERW, which clobbers ZF,
> for MDS mitigations as late as possible without needing to duplicate VERW
> for both paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists