linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] kexec: fix KEXEC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTjmsku919U6u6wt@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:58:10 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, eric_devolder@...oo.com
Cc:     Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kexec: fix KEXEC_FILE dependencies

On 10/24/23 at 03:17pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, at 14:44, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Just add people and mailing list to CC since I didn't find this mail in
> > my box, just drag it via 'b4 am'.
> >
> > On 10/23/23 at 01:01pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > ......
> 
> >> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
> >> index 7aff28ded2f48..bfc636d64ff2b 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
> >> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.kexec
> >> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ config KEXEC
> >>  config KEXEC_FILE
> >>  	bool "Enable kexec file based system call"
> >>  	depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_FILE
> >> +	depends on CRYPTO_SHA256=y || !ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> >
> > I am not sure if the logic is correct. In theory, kexec_file code
> > utilizes purgatory to verify the checksum digested during kernel loading
> > when try to jump to the kernel. That means kexec_file depends on
> > purgatory, but not contrary?
> 
> The expression I wrote is a bit confusing, but I think this just
> keeps the existing behavior:
> 
> - on architectures that select ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
>   (powerpc, riscv, s390 and x86), we also require CRYPTO_SHA256
>   to be built-in.
> - on architectures that do not have ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
>   (arm64 and parisc), CRYPTO_SHA256 is not used and can be disabled
>   or =m.
> 
> Since ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY is a 'bool' symbol, it could
> be written as
> 
> depends on (ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY && CRYPTO_SHA256=y) \
>            || !ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY

Yes, this seems to be clearer to me. Thanks.

> 
> if you find that clearer. I see that the second patch
> actually gets this wrong, it should actually do
> 
> select CRYPTO if ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> select CRYPTO_SHA256 if ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY

Yeah, makes sense to me.

Hi Eric,

Do you have comment about these?

> 
> > With these changes, we can achieve the goal to avoid building issue,
> > whereas the code logic becomes confusing. E.g people could disable
> > CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE, but still get purgatory code built in which is
> > totally useless.
> >
> > Not sure if I think too much over this.
> 
> I see your point here, and I would suggest changing the
> CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY symbol to just indicate
> the availability of the purgatory code for the arch, rather
> than actually controlling the code itself. I already mentioned
> this for s390, but riscv would need the same thing on top.
> 
> I think the change below should address your concern.
> 
>      Arnd
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/elf_kexec.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/elf_kexec.c
> index e60fbd8660c4..3ac341d296db 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/elf_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/elf_kexec.c
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void *elf_kexec_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>                 cmdline = modified_cmdline;
>         }
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE
>         /* Add purgatory to the image */
>         kbuf.top_down = true;
>         kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void *elf_kexec_load(struct kimage *image, char *kernel_buf,
>                                              sizeof(kernel_start), 0);
>         if (ret)
>                 pr_err("Error update purgatory ret=%d\n", ret);
> -#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE */

If so, we don't need the CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE ifdeffery because the
file elf_kexec.c relied on CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE enabling to build in.
We can just remove the "#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE..#endif" as x86 does.

>  
>         /* Add the initrd to the image */
>         if (initrd != NULL) {
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kbuild b/arch/riscv/Kbuild
> index d25ad1c19f88..ab181d187c23 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kbuild
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kbuild
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB) += boot/dts/
>  obj-y += errata/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += kvm/
>  
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY) += purgatory/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE) += purgatory/
>  
>  # for cleaning
>  subdir- += boot
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kbuild b/arch/s390/Kbuild
> index a5d3503b353c..361aa01dbd49 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kbuild
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kbuild
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_S390_HYPFS)        += hypfs/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_APPLDATA_BASE)    += appldata/
>  obj-y                          += net/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI)              += pci/
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY) += purgatory/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE)       += purgatory/
>  
>  # for cleaning
>  subdir- += boot tools
>