lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b0bc38c2c76917e9a29e216d6ae7d265a919d07.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>
Date:   Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:22:44 +1030
From:   Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc:     minyard@....org, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aladyshev22@...il.com,
        jk@...econstruct.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] ipmi: kcs_bmc: Make kcs_bmc_update_event_mask()
 static

On Fri, 2023-11-03 at 14:40 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri,  3 Nov 2023 16:45:15 +1030
> Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au> wrote:
> 
> > There were no users outside the subsystem core, so let's not expose it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
> Is it worth having the wrapper?

Perhaps not, though aesthetically I prefer it. Also the diff is at
least slightly smaller by not removing it entirely :)

> 
> I guess all the other cases do have wrappers (even if that's because
> they continue to be exported) so fair enough.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

Thanks,

Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ