[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpp4XNCwRzF=Lo4_oV7Gj1yDDcEQn5YJ5vXEx=HiJvByWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:14:14 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc: freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com,
quic_parellan@...cinc.com, quic_khsieh@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] drm/msm/dpu: do not allow YUV formats if no CDM
block is present
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 02:50, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/30/2023 5:24 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 01:50, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On chipsets where CDM block is not available OR where support has
> >> not been added yet do not allow YUV formats for writeback block.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_wb.c | 6 ++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_wb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_wb.c
> >> index 7fc174b33ae2..d8edca9bc964 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_wb.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_wb.c
> >> @@ -406,6 +406,12 @@ static int dpu_encoder_phys_wb_atomic_check(
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + if (DPU_FORMAT_IS_YUV(to_dpu_format(msm_framebuffer_format(fb))) &&
> >> + !phys_enc->dpu_kms->catalog->cdm) {
> >> + DPU_ERROR("cannot support YUV formats without CDM block\n");
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + }
> >
> > Can we have YUV formats in wb_formats if we do not support CDM? That
> > would be an error.
>
> I can drop this one once i address the comments on the next patch.
>
> Yeah the reason for this change was we had one formats array for wb and
> were using that for all chipsets. We can have two arrays : one only rgb
> and the other rgb+yuv to address this.
Yes, this sounds fine to me.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists