[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <079610c2-04ed-4495-8eb7-518b04f911f7@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:54:24 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: david@...hat.com, shikemeng@...weicloud.com, willy@...radead.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, hannes@...xchg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
Zhanyuan Hu <huzhanyuan@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: compaction: avoid fast_isolate_freepages blindly
choose improper pageblock
On 11/29/2023 6:45 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> Testing shows fast_isolate_freepages can blindly choose an unsuitable
> pageblock from time to time particularly while the min mark is used
> from XXX path:
> if (!page) {
> cc->fast_search_fail++;
> if (scan_start) {
> /*
> * Use the highest PFN found above min. If one was
> * not found, be pessimistic for direct compaction
> * and use the min mark.
> */
> if (highest >= min_pfn) {
> page = pfn_to_page(highest);
> cc->free_pfn = highest;
> } else {
> if (cc->direct_compaction && pfn_valid(min_pfn)) { /* XXX */
> page = pageblock_pfn_to_page(min_pfn,
> min(pageblock_end_pfn(min_pfn),
> zone_end_pfn(cc->zone)),
> cc->zone);
> cc->free_pfn = min_pfn;
> }
> }
> }
> }
Yes, the min_pfn can be an unsuitable migration target. But I think we
can just add the suitable_migration_target() validation into 'min_pfn'
case? Since other cases must be suitable target which found from
MIGRATE_MOVABLE free list. Something like below:
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 01ba298739dd..4e8eb4571909 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -1611,6 +1611,8 @@ static void fast_isolate_freepages(struct
compact_control *cc)
min(pageblock_end_pfn(min_pfn),
zone_end_pfn(cc->zone)),
cc->zone);
+ if
(!suitable_migration_target(cc, page))
+ page = NULL;
cc->free_pfn = min_pfn;
}
}
By the way, I wonder if this patch can improve the efficiency of
compaction in your test case?
> In contrast, slow path is skipping unsuitable pageblocks in a decent way.
>
> I don't know if it is an intended design or just an oversight. But
> it seems more sensible to skip unsuitable pageblock.
>
> Reported-by: Zhanyuan Hu <huzhanyuan@...o.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 01ba298739dd..98c485a25614 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -1625,6 +1625,12 @@ static void fast_isolate_freepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> cc->total_free_scanned += nr_scanned;
> if (!page)
> return;
> + /*
> + * Otherwise, we can blindly choose an improper pageblock especially
> + * while using the min mark
> + */
> + if (!suitable_migration_target(cc, page))
> + return;
>
> low_pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> fast_isolate_around(cc, low_pfn);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists