linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/13] btrfs: factor out block mapping for RAID5/6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:04:03 +0000
From:   Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
To:     "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
CC:     Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] btrfs: factor out block mapping for RAID5/6

On 13.12.23 09:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +static void map_blocks_for_raid56(struct btrfs_chunk_map *map,
>> +				  enum btrfs_map_op op,
>> +				  struct btrfs_io_geometry *io_geom,
>> +				  u64 logical, u64 *length)
>> +{
>> +	int data_stripes = nr_data_stripes(map);
>> +
>> +	if (op != BTRFS_MAP_READ || io_geom->mirror_num > 1) {
> 
> Any reason to not have separate read/write helpers here given that
> they don't really share anything?
> 

Nope, can do sure.