[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240130163418.GGZbklCltPHmo2Z1NB@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:34:18 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/fred: Fix build with CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=n
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 04:30:34PM +0000, Li, Xin3 wrote:
> Even more interesting, gcc doesn't complain it with the attached config
> File in which CONFIG_X86_FRED=y and CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION not set.
Yes, CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=n alone is not enough. That .config which
triggers it has something else which is causing this but I'm not sure
I want to go chase down what it is...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists