[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86h6i849jt.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:13:10 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
aneesh.kumar@...nel.org,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Get rid of return value from kvm_arch_create_vm_debugfs()
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:59:41 +0000,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> The general expectation with debugfs is that any initialization failure
> is nonfatal. Nevertheless, kvm_arch_create_vm_debugfs() allows
> implementations to return an error and kvm_create_vm_debugfs() allows
> that to fail VM creation.
>
> Change to a void return to discourage architectures from making debugfs
> failures fatal for the VM. Seems like everyone already had the right
> idea, as all implementations already return 0 unconditionally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists