[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o7c39jgu.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:19:29 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/apic] smp: Provide 'setup_max_cpus' definition on UP too
On Mon, Feb 26 2024 at 11:48, tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/smp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/smp.h
> @@ -218,6 +218,8 @@ smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask, smp_call_func_t func,
> static inline void kick_all_cpus_sync(void) { }
> static inline void wake_up_all_idle_cpus(void) { }
>
> +static const unsigned int setup_max_cpus = 0;
Oops. I missed that when looking at the patch. This is in a header file
and will be instantiated a gazillion times where ever the header is
included. It want's to be a define, no?
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/include/linux/smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ smp_call_function_any(const struct cpuma
static inline void kick_all_cpus_sync(void) { }
static inline void wake_up_all_idle_cpus(void) { }
-static const unsigned int setup_max_cpus = 0;
+#define setup_max_cpus (0)
#ifdef CONFIG_UP_LATE_INIT
extern void __init up_late_init(void);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists